Apple Halts Sales of Apple Watch Series 9 and Ultra 2 in the US Ahead of Pending Patent Ban

Apple has made the decision to stop selling the Apple Watch Series 9 and Ultra 2 in the US through its online store just days before a ban related to a patent dispute is set to take effect. In addition to this, Apple will also no longer be able to repair watch models that are out of warranty, which could potentially cause headaches for consumers who rely on Apple’s repair services.

Background on the sales ban

This sales ban was imposed by the US International Trade Commission (ITC) after it ruled that Apple had violated two health technology patents related to blood oxygen sensing. These patents are held by Masimo, a company based in Irvine, California. The ITC’s ruling highlights the significance of these patents in relation to Apple’s technology and the potential infringements.

Apple’s response to the ban

In response to the ban, Apple has posted a message on its website stating that it no longer sells Apple Watch units in the United States equipped with the ability to measure blood oxygen. This move signals Apple’s compliance with the ITC’s ruling and its efforts to avoid further legal complications.

Impact on watch repairs

Not only does the ban affect sales, but it also impacts Apple’s ability to repair out-of-warranty watch models. Apple will no longer replace these models going back to the Apple Watch Series 6. This decision has a wide-reaching impact, affecting most new Apple Watches sold since 2020, including Series 6, 7, 8, Ultra, and the current Series 9 and Ultra 2. Consumers who rely on Apple’s repair services may face difficulties in getting their out-of-warranty watches fixed.

Limitations on customer options

In addition to the restrictions on repairs, customers will also face limitations on their options regarding watch exchanges. After December 25, when the ban comes into effect, Apple will not allow customers to exchange watches purchased before the ban for different colors or sizes during the typical return period. This restriction may frustrate customers who wish to switch their watches or match them with their personal preferences.

Communication restrictions for employees

To comply with the legal order, Apple has informed its employees that they are prohibited from informing customers that the Apple Watch is still available for purchase at third-party retailers like Best Buy and Target. This restriction on communication aims to avoid further legal complications and ensure Apple’s compliance with the ban.

Duration and Potential Resolutions

The ban on the sale of Apple Watches equipped with blood oxygen measurement capabilities will remain in effect until Apple can reach a licensing agreement with Masimo, receive a federal reprieve, or successfully resolve the patent dispute. The duration of this ban is uncertain, and it will depend on the progress of negotiations or any legal actions taken by Apple.

Apple’s decision to halt the sales of the Apple Watch Series 9 and Ultra 2, as well as the limitation on out-of-warranty repairs, is a direct response to an upcoming ban resulting from patent infringements identified by the US International Trade Commission. Consumers who have purchased watches before the ban comes into effect and still have warranty coverage will not be affected, but others will face challenges in getting their watches repaired or exchanged. It is important for customers to be aware of these limitations and potential impacts on their Apple Watch purchases and repairs. Apple’s compliance with the ban demonstrates its commitment to resolving the patent dispute and finding a resolution with Masimo in the near future.

Explore more

How Small Businesses Can Master Payroll and Compliance

The moment an ambitious founder signs the paperwork for their very first hire, they unwittingly step across an invisible threshold from simple entrepreneurship into the high-stakes arena of federal and state tax regulation. This transition is often quiet, masked by the excitement of a growing team and the urgent demands of a scaling product. Yet, beneath the surface of that

Is AI the Problem or Is It How We Use It in Hiring?

A job seeker spends an entire Sunday afternoon meticulously tailoring a resume and answering complex behavioral prompts, only to receive a standardized rejection email less than ninety minutes after clicking submit. This “two-hour rejection” has become a defining characteristic of the modern job market, creating a profound sense of alienation among professionals who feel they are screaming into a digital

Is Generative AI Slowing Down the Recruitment Process?

The traditional handshake between talent and opportunity has morphed into a high-stakes digital standoff where algorithmic speed creates massive human resource bottlenecks. While generative artificial intelligence promised to streamline the matching of candidates to roles, it has instead ignited a digital arms race that threatens to bury hiring managers under a mountain of synthetic perfection. Today, the ease of generating

AI Use by Job Seekers Slows Down the Hiring Process

The global labor market is currently facing an unprecedented crisis where the very tools designed to accelerate professional connections are instead creating a massive digital bottleneck in the talent pipeline. While the initial promise of generative artificial intelligence was to streamline the match between skills and vacancies, the reality in 2026 has shifted toward a high-stakes game of algorithmic hide-and-seek.

Is AI Eliminating the Entry-Level Career Path?

The traditional corporate hierarchy is currently navigating a foundational structural shift that threatens to dismantle the decades-old “entry-level gateway” once used by every aspiring professional to launch a career. As of 2026, the modern workplace is no longer a predictable ladder where young graduates perform foundational tasks to earn their climb; instead, it has become an automated landscape where cognitive