What Are The Key Differences Between Time to Fill and Time to Hire?

Although some people use the terms interchangeably, “time to fill” and “time to hire” are distinctly different metrics that serve integral parts of the talent acquisition process. The former measures the average number of days it takes to have someone start working in a role, while the latter tracks how fast a candidate progresses through the hiring process until the offer stage, labor experts informed HR Dive. This differentiation can have significant impacts on how companies assess their recruitment efficiency and candidate experience.

Calculating Time to Fill

Rick Hermanns, CEO of global staffing company HireQuest, previously explained his method for calculating the metric known as time to fill. The process involves three essential steps:

  • Define the start and end points for measurement. Typically, the clock might start ticking when a job is posted or when HR receives a job requisition form, ending when the candidate officially begins work.
  • Calculate the duration for a single position by counting the number of workdays from the starting point to the endpoint.
  • Summate the time to fill for each position and divide by the total number of positions filled to obtain the average time to fill.

Adopting these guidelines provides a straightforward way to measure and optimize recruitment timelines.

Trends Around Time to Hire

The report by human capital management company The Josh Bersin Co. and talent firm AMS indicates that time-to-hire rates have risen in recent years, revealing it now takes an average of 44 days to fill a job opening. However, this figure can vary significantly depending on the industry. For instance, energy and defense sectors face more prolonged hiring periods, averaging 67 days for specialists.

The data underscores varying ease and difficulty levels in filling positions, which can inform strategic adjustments to recruitment processes across different sectors. Notably, the findings pointed out that overall hiring in many regions is expected to slow and face more challenges.

The Bottom Line

People often confuse “time to fill” and “time to hire,” but these metrics are quite different and both play important roles in the talent acquisition process. “Time to fill” refers to the average number of days it takes from when a job is posted until a candidate starts working. On the other hand, “time to hire” measures the speed at which someone moves through the hiring process, from the initial job application to the moment an offer is made. According to labor experts consulted by HR Dive, understanding these differences is crucial for companies. It allows organizations to better evaluate their recruitment efficiency and improve aspects of the candidate experience. By analyzing both metrics, employers can identify delays in the hiring process and make improvements to attract and secure top talent more effectively. This kind of insight can lead to more strategic decision-making in talent acquisition, ultimately benefiting both the company and potential employees.

Explore more

Data Centers Tap Unused Renewable Energy for AI Demand

The rapid growth in demand for artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency services has led to an energy consumption surge worldwide, particularly from data centers. These digital powerhouses require increasingly large amounts of electricity to maintain operations and ensure optimal performance. As renewable energy production rises, specifically from wind and solar sources, a significant portion goes untapped due to constraints within the

Groq Expands in Europe With Helsinki AI Data Center Launch

In an era dominated by artificial intelligence, Groq Inc., hailed as a pioneer in AI semiconductors, has made a bold leap by establishing its inaugural European data center in Helsinki, Finland. Partnering with Equinix, this strategic step signals not only Groq’s ambitious vision for global expansion but also taps into Europe’s rising demand for innovative AI solutions. The location, favoring

Will Tokenized Bonds Transform Payroll and SME Financing?

The current financial environment is witnessing an extraordinary shift as tokenized bonds begin to redefine payroll processes and small and medium enterprise (SME) financing. Utilizing blockchain technology, these digital versions of bonds promise enhanced transparency, quicker transactions, and streamlined operations. As financial innovation unfolds, the integration of tokenized bonds presents a remarkable opportunity for businesses to modernize their remuneration methods

Trend Analysis: Cryptocurrency Payroll Integration

The Rise of Cryptocurrency in Payroll Systems Understanding the Market Dynamics Recent data reveals an intriguing trend: a growing number of organizations are integrating cryptocurrencies into their payroll systems. Reports underscore unprecedented interest and adoption rates in this domain. For instance, FLOKI’s bullish market dynamics highlight how cryptocurrencies are capturing attention in payroll implementations. Experiencing a significant upsurge in its

Integrated Payroll Solution Enhances Compliance for Aussie Firms

Rapidly shifting regulatory landscapes continue to challenge businesses globally, and Australia is no exception. The introduction of the new PayDay Super laws in Australia, effective from July 2026, represents a significant change in the payroll and superannuation landscape. These laws criminalize non-compliance, specifically targeting failures in the simultaneous payment of superannuation contributions and wages. This formidable compliance burden necessitates innovation,