What Are The Key Differences Between Time to Fill and Time to Hire?

Although some people use the terms interchangeably, “time to fill” and “time to hire” are distinctly different metrics that serve integral parts of the talent acquisition process. The former measures the average number of days it takes to have someone start working in a role, while the latter tracks how fast a candidate progresses through the hiring process until the offer stage, labor experts informed HR Dive. This differentiation can have significant impacts on how companies assess their recruitment efficiency and candidate experience.

Calculating Time to Fill

Rick Hermanns, CEO of global staffing company HireQuest, previously explained his method for calculating the metric known as time to fill. The process involves three essential steps:

  • Define the start and end points for measurement. Typically, the clock might start ticking when a job is posted or when HR receives a job requisition form, ending when the candidate officially begins work.
  • Calculate the duration for a single position by counting the number of workdays from the starting point to the endpoint.
  • Summate the time to fill for each position and divide by the total number of positions filled to obtain the average time to fill.

Adopting these guidelines provides a straightforward way to measure and optimize recruitment timelines.

Trends Around Time to Hire

The report by human capital management company The Josh Bersin Co. and talent firm AMS indicates that time-to-hire rates have risen in recent years, revealing it now takes an average of 44 days to fill a job opening. However, this figure can vary significantly depending on the industry. For instance, energy and defense sectors face more prolonged hiring periods, averaging 67 days for specialists.

The data underscores varying ease and difficulty levels in filling positions, which can inform strategic adjustments to recruitment processes across different sectors. Notably, the findings pointed out that overall hiring in many regions is expected to slow and face more challenges.

The Bottom Line

People often confuse “time to fill” and “time to hire,” but these metrics are quite different and both play important roles in the talent acquisition process. “Time to fill” refers to the average number of days it takes from when a job is posted until a candidate starts working. On the other hand, “time to hire” measures the speed at which someone moves through the hiring process, from the initial job application to the moment an offer is made. According to labor experts consulted by HR Dive, understanding these differences is crucial for companies. It allows organizations to better evaluate their recruitment efficiency and improve aspects of the candidate experience. By analyzing both metrics, employers can identify delays in the hiring process and make improvements to attract and secure top talent more effectively. This kind of insight can lead to more strategic decision-making in talent acquisition, ultimately benefiting both the company and potential employees.

Explore more

How Is AI Revolutionizing Payroll in HR Management?

Imagine a scenario where payroll errors cost a multinational corporation millions annually due to manual miscalculations and delayed corrections, shaking employee trust and straining HR resources. This is not a far-fetched situation but a reality many organizations faced before the advent of cutting-edge technology. Payroll, once considered a mundane back-office task, has emerged as a critical pillar of employee satisfaction

AI-Driven B2B Marketing – Review

Setting the Stage for AI in B2B Marketing Imagine a marketing landscape where 80% of repetitive tasks are handled not by teams of professionals, but by intelligent systems that draft content, analyze data, and target buyers with precision, transforming the reality of B2B marketing in 2025. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a powerful force in this space, offering solutions

5 Ways Behavioral Science Boosts B2B Marketing Success

In today’s cutthroat B2B marketing arena, a staggering statistic reveals a harsh truth: over 70% of marketing emails go unopened, buried under an avalanche of digital clutter. Picture a meticulously crafted campaign—polished visuals, compelling data, and airtight logic—vanishing into the void of ignored inboxes and skipped LinkedIn posts. What if the key to breaking through isn’t just sharper tactics, but

Trend Analysis: Private Cloud Resurgence in APAC

In an era where public cloud solutions have long been heralded as the ultimate destination for enterprise IT, a surprising shift is unfolding across the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region, with private cloud infrastructure staging a remarkable comeback. This resurgence challenges the notion that public cloud is the only path forward, as businesses grapple with stringent data sovereignty laws, complex compliance requirements,

iPhone 17 Series Faces Price Hikes Due to US Tariffs

What happens when the sleek, cutting-edge device in your pocket becomes a casualty of global trade wars? As Apple unveils the iPhone 17 series this year, consumers are bracing for a jolt—not just from groundbreaking technology, but from price tags that sting more than ever. Reports suggest that tariffs imposed by the US on Chinese goods are driving costs upward,