U.S. Senators Introduce Legislation to Protect Workers from Automated Employment Decision Systems

In a proactive move to safeguard workers’ rights and protect them from discriminatory practices, U.S. Senators Bob Casey (D-PA) and Brian Schatz (D-HI) recently introduced the No Robot Bosses Act. This legislation aims to address concerns over the increasing use of automated decision systems by employers in making employment decisions. Alongside this act, the senators also introduced the Exploitative Workplace Surveillance and Technologies Task Force Act, which seeks to study and report on the impact of surveillance technologies in the workplace.

Concerns over the use of automated decision systems

One of the primary motivations behind the No Robot Bosses Act is to protect workers’ rights, autonomy, and dignity. With the rise of automated decision systems, there is growing concern that employers may rely solely on algorithms to make employment decisions, such as hiring, managing, or even firing workers, without involving human oversight. This lack of human involvement raises questions about potential discrimination, lack of transparency, and the erosion of worker agency.

New York City’s law on regulating automated employment decision tools

New York City recently took a step towards addressing the use of automated employment decision tools (AEDTs). Under the city’s new law, which came into effect on July 5, employers must now disclose if they use AI tools to make hiring decisions. This disclosure requirement aims to bring transparency to the process, providing job applicants with the knowledge that their application was evaluated, at least in part, by an algorithm.

Introduction of the Exploitative Workplace Surveillance and Technologies Task Force Act

In addition to the No Robot Bosses Act, Senators Casey, Schatz, and Cory Booker (D-NJ) have introduced the Exploitative Workplace Surveillance and Technologies Task Force Act. This act focuses on the growing use of surveillance technologies in workplaces and establishes an interagency task force to study and report on its impact. The goal is to gain a better understanding of how these technologies may infringe upon workers’ rights and privacy.

Increase in Interest in Employee Tracking Software

The need to address workplace surveillance technologies is evident in the growing interest in employee tracking software. Recent statistics indicate that Google searches for the term “employee tracking software” in the United States increased from 720 monthly in June 2022 to 1,600 monthly in May 2023. This surge in interest highlights the urgency to establish regulations and protect workers from the potential misuse of surveillance technologies.

Aims of the proposed legislation

The No Robot Bosses Act seeks to establish clear regulations and transparency requirements around the use of AI and bots in employment decisions. By doing so, it aims to address concerns of potential algorithmic bias and discrimination, ensuring that workers are treated fairly throughout the hiring and employment process. The legislation intends to strike a balance between the benefits of automation and the protection of worker rights, dignity, and agency.

The introduction of the No Robot Bosses Act and the Exploitative Workplace Surveillance and Technologies Task Force Act demonstrates a commitment to protecting working families from the dangers posed by the misuse and abuse of novel technologies in the workplace. These acts aim to establish regulations, transparency, and oversight mechanisms to ensure that automated decision systems are used responsibly and do not infringe upon workers’ rights. As technology continues to advance, it is crucial that lawmakers remain vigilant in safeguarding workers’ autonomy and dignity in the face of automation.

Explore more

Can Brand-First Marketing Drive B2B Leads?

In the highly competitive and often formulaic world of B2B technology marketing, the prevailing wisdom has long been to prioritize lead generation and data-driven metrics over the seemingly less tangible goal of brand building. This approach, however, often results in a sea of sameness, where companies struggle to differentiate themselves beyond feature lists and pricing tables. But a recent campaign

How Did HR’s Watchdog Lose a $11.5M Bias Case?

The very institution that champions ethical workplace practices and certifies human resources professionals across the globe has found itself on the losing end of a staggering multi-million dollar discrimination lawsuit. A Colorado jury’s decision to award $11.5 million against the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) in a racial bias and retaliation case has created a profound sense of cognitive

Can Corporate DEI Survive Its Legal Reckoning?

With the legal landscape for diversity initiatives shifting dramatically, we sat down with Ling-yi Tsai, our HRTech expert with decades of experience helping organizations navigate change. In the wake of Florida’s lawsuit against Starbucks, which accuses the company of implementing illegal race-based policies, we explored the new fault lines in corporate DEI. Our conversation delves into the specific programs facing

AI-Powered SEO Planning – Review

The disjointed chaos of managing keyword spreadsheets, competitor research documents, and scattered content ideas is rapidly becoming a relic of digital marketing’s past. The adoption of AI in SEO Planning represents a significant advancement in the digital marketing sector, moving teams away from fragmented workflows and toward integrated, intelligent strategy execution. This review will explore the evolution of this technology,

How Are Robots Becoming More Human-Centric?

The familiar narrative of robotics has long been dominated by visions of autonomous machines performing repetitive tasks with cold efficiency, but a profound transformation is quietly reshaping this landscape from the factory floor to the research lab. A new generation of robotics is emerging, designed not merely to replace human labor but to augment it, collaborate with it, and even