Supreme Court Verdict: Third-Party Drug Testers Not Liable for Negligence

In a landmark case that questioned the responsibilities of third-party drug testing entities when it comes to the termination of an employee, the Texas Supreme Court delivered a significant ruling. At the heart of the dispute was the issue of whether a third-party entity, hired by an employer to collect and test drug samples from employees, owed a common-law duty to perform these services with reasonable care. This article examines the details, legal arguments, and final outcome of this crucial case.

Background on the case and the role of third-party drug testing entities

The case involved an employee, referred to as the respondent, who worked as a pipefitter and had never tested positive for drug use during his employment. However, a particular drug test yielded a positive result for cocaine, which the respondent vehemently denied using. Consequently, the employee was required to complete a substance-abuse course by the Drug & Alcohol Testing Industry Association (DISA) before returning to work. Surprisingly, Turnaround, the respondent’s employer, refused to reassign him to any job site despite DISA’s approval.

Lawsuits and Claims against Third-Party Entities

Feeling wronged and unjustly terminated, the respondent filed a lawsuit against Turnaround. Eventually, he settled his claims with the employer and turned his attention towards Safety Council and Psychemedics, third-party entities responsible for collecting and processing his drug samples. According to the respondent, the alleged negligence of these entities led to his loss of employment. He sought legal redress for their alleged role in his termination.

Trial court and appellate court decisions

The trial court ruling came as a blow to the respondent when it determined that neither Safety Council nor Psychemedics owed him a legal duty. The court’s reasoning lay in the fact that these entities had no control over Turnaround’s decision to terminate the employee. However, on appeal, the Court of Appeals overturned the trial court’s decision. The appellate court found that a legal duty existed for third-party entities to use reasonable care in collecting and processing biological samples for drug testing.

Texas Supreme Court decision

The petitioners, Safety Council and Psychemedics, appealed the case to the Texas Supreme Court. In a definitive ruling, the Supreme Court sided with the petitioners, reversing the appellate court’s judgment. The court made it clear that third-party entities collecting or processing samples from employees did not owe a common-law duty of care. They highlighted that these entities had no control over the employer’s decision to terminate the employee, absolving them of any liability.

Arguments against imposing a new duty

The petitioners argued against imposing a new legal duty upon third-party drug testing entities, as it could lead to frivolous and burdensome claims. Additionally, they raised concerns about the potential transfer of responsibility, increased costs, and a decline in employment drug screens. They argued that imposing such a duty might prompt employers to take over the drug-testing programs themselves, potentially eroding the employment-at-will doctrine and exposing employers to further liability.

Implications and Consequences

Recognizing a new duty for third-party entities in collecting and processing samples from employees could have significant implications. Employers may choose to bring the drug testing program in-house to avoid potential liability, altering the current structure. This shift in responsibility might have consequences such as increased costs, delayed results, and potential conflicts of interest. Furthermore, it could undermine the employment-at-will doctrine, impacting employers’ flexibility in managing their workforce.

In a precedent-setting decision, the Texas Supreme Court ruled that third-party entities involved in collecting and processing employee drug samples do not owe a common-law duty to perform these services with reasonable care. The court’s reasoning emphasized the lack of control these entities had over the employer’s decision to terminate an employee. This ruling safeguards against potential frivolous claims, shields employers from unnecessary liability, and maintains the integrity of employment drug tests. However, it is essential to continue monitoring the evolving landscape around workplace drug testing and the role of third-party entities in ensuring a fair and responsible process.

Explore more

Why Should Leaders Invest in Employee Career Growth?

In today’s fast-paced business landscape, a staggering statistic reveals the stakes of neglecting employee development: turnover costs the median S&P 500 company $480 million annually due to talent loss, underscoring a critical challenge for leaders. This immense financial burden highlights the urgent need to retain skilled individuals and maintain a competitive edge through strategic initiatives. Employee career growth, often overlooked

Making Time for Questions to Boost Workplace Curiosity

Introduction to Fostering Inquiry at Work Imagine a bustling office where deadlines loom large, meetings are packed with agendas, and every minute counts—yet no one dares to ask a clarifying question for fear of derailing the schedule. This scenario is all too common in modern workplaces, where the pressure to perform often overshadows the need for curiosity. Fostering an environment

Embedded Finance: From SaaS Promise to SME Practice

Imagine a small business owner managing daily operations through a single software platform, seamlessly handling not just inventory or customer relations but also payments, loans, and business accounts without ever stepping into a bank. This is the transformative vision of embedded finance, a trend that integrates financial services directly into vertical Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) platforms, turning them into indispensable tools for

DevOps Tools: Gateways to Major Cyberattacks Exposed

In the rapidly evolving digital ecosystem, DevOps tools have emerged as indispensable assets for organizations aiming to streamline software development and IT operations with unmatched efficiency, making them critical to modern business success. Platforms like GitHub, Jira, and Confluence enable seamless collaboration, allowing teams to manage code, track projects, and document workflows at an accelerated pace. However, this very integration

Trend Analysis: Agentic DevOps in Digital Transformation

In an era where digital transformation remains a critical yet elusive goal for countless enterprises, the frustration of stalled progress is palpable— over 70% of initiatives fail to meet expectations, costing billions annually in wasted resources and missed opportunities. This staggering reality underscores a persistent struggle to modernize IT infrastructure amid soaring costs and sluggish timelines. As companies grapple with