Supreme Court Verdict: Third-Party Drug Testers Not Liable for Negligence

In a landmark case that questioned the responsibilities of third-party drug testing entities when it comes to the termination of an employee, the Texas Supreme Court delivered a significant ruling. At the heart of the dispute was the issue of whether a third-party entity, hired by an employer to collect and test drug samples from employees, owed a common-law duty to perform these services with reasonable care. This article examines the details, legal arguments, and final outcome of this crucial case.

Background on the case and the role of third-party drug testing entities

The case involved an employee, referred to as the respondent, who worked as a pipefitter and had never tested positive for drug use during his employment. However, a particular drug test yielded a positive result for cocaine, which the respondent vehemently denied using. Consequently, the employee was required to complete a substance-abuse course by the Drug & Alcohol Testing Industry Association (DISA) before returning to work. Surprisingly, Turnaround, the respondent’s employer, refused to reassign him to any job site despite DISA’s approval.

Lawsuits and Claims against Third-Party Entities

Feeling wronged and unjustly terminated, the respondent filed a lawsuit against Turnaround. Eventually, he settled his claims with the employer and turned his attention towards Safety Council and Psychemedics, third-party entities responsible for collecting and processing his drug samples. According to the respondent, the alleged negligence of these entities led to his loss of employment. He sought legal redress for their alleged role in his termination.

Trial court and appellate court decisions

The trial court ruling came as a blow to the respondent when it determined that neither Safety Council nor Psychemedics owed him a legal duty. The court’s reasoning lay in the fact that these entities had no control over Turnaround’s decision to terminate the employee. However, on appeal, the Court of Appeals overturned the trial court’s decision. The appellate court found that a legal duty existed for third-party entities to use reasonable care in collecting and processing biological samples for drug testing.

Texas Supreme Court decision

The petitioners, Safety Council and Psychemedics, appealed the case to the Texas Supreme Court. In a definitive ruling, the Supreme Court sided with the petitioners, reversing the appellate court’s judgment. The court made it clear that third-party entities collecting or processing samples from employees did not owe a common-law duty of care. They highlighted that these entities had no control over the employer’s decision to terminate the employee, absolving them of any liability.

Arguments against imposing a new duty

The petitioners argued against imposing a new legal duty upon third-party drug testing entities, as it could lead to frivolous and burdensome claims. Additionally, they raised concerns about the potential transfer of responsibility, increased costs, and a decline in employment drug screens. They argued that imposing such a duty might prompt employers to take over the drug-testing programs themselves, potentially eroding the employment-at-will doctrine and exposing employers to further liability.

Implications and Consequences

Recognizing a new duty for third-party entities in collecting and processing samples from employees could have significant implications. Employers may choose to bring the drug testing program in-house to avoid potential liability, altering the current structure. This shift in responsibility might have consequences such as increased costs, delayed results, and potential conflicts of interest. Furthermore, it could undermine the employment-at-will doctrine, impacting employers’ flexibility in managing their workforce.

In a precedent-setting decision, the Texas Supreme Court ruled that third-party entities involved in collecting and processing employee drug samples do not owe a common-law duty to perform these services with reasonable care. The court’s reasoning emphasized the lack of control these entities had over the employer’s decision to terminate an employee. This ruling safeguards against potential frivolous claims, shields employers from unnecessary liability, and maintains the integrity of employment drug tests. However, it is essential to continue monitoring the evolving landscape around workplace drug testing and the role of third-party entities in ensuring a fair and responsible process.

Explore more

Creating Gen Z-Friendly Workplaces for Engagement and Retention

The modern workplace is evolving at an unprecedented pace, driven significantly by the aspirations and values of Generation Z. Born into a world rich with digital technology, these individuals have developed unique expectations for their professional environments, diverging significantly from those of previous generations. As this cohort continues to enter the workforce in increasing numbers, companies are faced with the

Unbossing: Navigating Risks of Flat Organizational Structures

The tech industry is abuzz with the trend of unbossing, where companies adopt flat organizational structures to boost innovation. This shift entails minimizing management layers to increase efficiency, a strategy pursued by major players like Meta, Salesforce, and Microsoft. While this methodology promises agility and empowerment, it also brings a significant risk: the potential disengagement of employees. Managerial engagement has

How Is AI Changing the Hiring Process?

As digital demand intensifies in today’s job market, countless candidates find themselves trapped in a cycle of applying to jobs without ever hearing back. This frustration often stems from AI-powered recruitment systems that automatically filter out résumés before they reach human recruiters. These automated processes, known as Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS), utilize keyword matching to determine candidate eligibility. However, this

Accor’s Digital Shift: AI-Driven Hospitality Innovation

In an era where technological integration is rapidly transforming industries, Accor has embarked on a significant digital transformation under the guidance of Alix Boulnois, the Chief Commercial, Digital, and Tech Officer. This transformation is not only redefining the hospitality landscape but also setting new benchmarks in how guest experiences, operational efficiencies, and loyalty frameworks are managed. Accor’s approach involves a

CAF Advances with SAP S/4HANA Cloud for Sustainable Growth

CAF, a leader in urban rail and bus systems, is undergoing a significant digital transformation by migrating to SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition. This move marks a defining point for the company as it shifts from an on-premises customized environment to a standardized, cloud-based framework. Strategically positioned in Beasain, Spain, CAF has successfully woven SAP solutions into its core business