Navigating the Fine Print: California Court Clarifies Small Print in Arbitration Agreements as Procedural Issues

Arbitration agreements have become increasingly popular in California and other states as a means of resolving disputes between employers and employees. However, the enforceability of these agreements has recently come under scrutiny by courts, particularly in instances where the agreement is signed by an employee without fully understanding its terms. In a recent decision, the California Court of Appeal held that small and unreadable print in an arbitration agreement renders the agreement unenforceable. This decision came in the case of Fuentes v. Empire Nissan, Inc. et al., where the plaintiff signed an arbitration agreement with Empire Nissan, Inc.

Small font and unreadable print are affecting arbitration agreements

In recent years, there has been a growing concern among employees and employee advocacy groups about the use of arbitration agreements by employers. These agreements require employees to waive their right to sue in court in the event of a dispute with their employer and instead require them to submit to binding arbitration. The concern stems from the fact that employees may not fully understand the implications of signing such an agreement, particularly if the agreement is written in small font and difficult to read.

The problem with small fonts and unreadable print in arbitration agreements is that it affects procedural unconscionability. Procedural unconscionability refers to the circumstances surrounding the formation of a contract, including the process by which the parties enter into the agreement. If an agreement is signed without the employee fully understanding its terms, it can be deemed procedurally unconscionable and, therefore, unenforceable.

In the case of Fuentes v. Empire Nissan, Inc. et al., the plaintiff applied to work for Empire Nissan, Inc. and signed an arbitration agreement. Later, Nissan terminated the plaintiff, and she filed a lawsuit alleging discrimination and wrongful termination against three defendants – Nissan, Romero Motors Corporation, and Oremor Management & Investment Company.

California Court of Appeal’s Decision

The trial court ruled that the arbitration agreement was unenforceable based on the plaintiff’s argument that the print was too small, and the agreement was therefore procedurally unconscionable. The California Court of Appeal for the Second District disagreed with the trial court’s decision and ordered it to compel arbitration. However, the appellate court noted that the small and unreadable font used during the contract formation stage was problematic for procedural reasons.

Procedural concerns with tiny and unreadable fonts

The use of small and unreadable fonts during the contract formation stage is problematic for several reasons. For one, an employee may not be able to read the agreement or understand its provisions, which can have serious consequences if the agreement waives or limits the employee’s legal rights. Additionally, an employee who is unable to read the agreement may be coerced or forced into signing it, especially if they are in a position of vulnerability, such as in the case of a job applicant.

Assessment of Mutual and Fair Agreement by the California Court of Appeal

The appellate court held that the arbitration agreement was mutual and even-handed, and therefore not substantively unconscionable. The plaintiff had argued that the agreement was unfair since it did not explain how to initiate arbitration. However, the court found that this was not a sufficient ground to render the agreement unenforceable. Ultimately, the court held that the agreement was enforceable, but noted that the small and unreadable font used during the contract formation stage cast procedural unconscionability on its enforceability.

Rejection of the Plaintiff’s Claim of Unfairness

The court’s decision to compel arbitration meant that the plaintiff’s claims would be heard in arbitration rather than in court. The plaintiff’s argument that the agreement was unfair, and therefore unenforceable, was rejected by the court, which found that the agreement was fair and did not violate public policy.

The decision in Fuentes v. Empire Nissan, Inc. et al. highlights the importance of ensuring that arbitration agreements are readable and understandable. Employees who sign such agreements should be fully aware of their legal rights and the implications of any provisions in the agreement. Employers who use such agreements should take care to ensure that they are not procedurally or substantively unconscionable. Ultimately, the enforceability of an arbitration agreement may depend on the specific circumstances surrounding its formation and whether it is fair and even-handed, regardless of the font size.

Explore more

D365 Supply Chain Tackles Key Operational Challenges

Imagine a mid-sized manufacturer struggling to keep up with fluctuating demand, facing constant stockouts, and losing customer trust due to delayed deliveries, a scenario all too common in today’s volatile supply chain environment. Rising costs, fragmented data, and unexpected disruptions threaten operational stability, making it essential for businesses, especially small and medium-sized enterprises (SMBs) and manufacturers, to find ways to

Cloud ERP vs. On-Premise ERP: A Comparative Analysis

Imagine a business at a critical juncture, where every decision about technology could make or break its ability to compete in a fast-paced market, and for many organizations, selecting the right Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system becomes that pivotal choice—a decision that impacts efficiency, scalability, and profitability. This comparison delves into two primary deployment models for ERP systems: Cloud ERP

Selecting the Best Shipping Solution for D365SCM Users

Imagine a bustling warehouse where every minute counts, and a single shipping delay ripples through the entire supply chain, frustrating customers and costing thousands in lost revenue. For businesses using Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management (D365SCM), this scenario is all too real when the wrong shipping solution disrupts operations. Choosing the right tool to integrate with this powerful platform

How Is AI Reshaping the Future of Content Marketing?

Dive into the future of content marketing with Aisha Amaira, a MarTech expert whose passion for blending technology with marketing has made her a go-to voice in the industry. With deep expertise in CRM marketing technology and customer data platforms, Aisha has a unique perspective on how businesses can harness innovation to uncover critical customer insights. In this interview, we

Why Are Older Job Seekers Facing Record Ageism Complaints?

In an era where workforce diversity is often championed as a cornerstone of innovation, a troubling trend has emerged that threatens to undermine these ideals, particularly for those over 50 seeking employment. Recent data reveals a staggering surge in complaints about ageism, painting a stark picture of systemic bias in hiring practices across the U.S. This issue not only affects