Hyatt Found to Violate California Labor Law by Delaying Vacation Time Payout to Laid-Off Employees

In a recent case involving Hyatt, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that the company violated California labor law by failing to promptly pay out vacation time to its laid-off employees. The court’s decision comes after it found that Hyatt’s decision to delay payment until June 2020, when the employees were formally terminated, was in violation of the prompt payment provisions outlined in the California Labor Code.

Violation of California labor law

According to court documents, the California Labor Code requires employers to promptly pay out vacation time to employees upon termination. The court determined that Hyatt’s delay in paying out vacation time to its laid-off employees was a direct violation of this provision. The court’s ruling reverses the summary judgment previously granted in favor of Hyatt by the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California and remands the case back to the district court for further proceedings.

Defining ‘Discharge’

One of the crucial aspects considered by the appeals court was the definition of ‘discharge.’ Given that the law does not explicitly define this term, the court sought clarity on whether a temporary layoff, with no specified return date, would qualify as a discharge under Section 201 of the California Labor Code. Interestingly, the court found no existing case law or cited cases that provided clear guidance on this matter.

DLSE Opinion and Guidance

In the absence of relevant case law, the appeals court turned to the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE) for guidance. The DLSE, through an opinion letter and its policies and interpretations manual, stated that a temporary layoff without a specific return date within the normal pay period would be considered a discharge, triggering the prompt payment provisions of the California Labor Code.

Ruling based on DLSE guidance

Relying on the DLSE’s interpretation, the appeals court concluded that Hyatt should have paid accrued vacation pay to its employees during the initial layoff in March 2020. As the temporary layoff exceeded the normal pay period and had no specified return date, the court ruled that the delayed payout of vacation time was a violation of the state law’s prompt payment provisions.

Acknowledging Pandemic Uncertainty

While acknowledging the challenging circumstances faced by businesses during the early period of the pandemic, the appeals court emphasized that Hyatt’s actions, although understandable, did not absolve the company from the violation. The court maintained that the March 2020 layoff qualified as a discharge under Section 201 of the California Labor Code, and therefore, Hyatt was obligated to promptly pay out the accrued vacation time to its employees.

Hyatt’s response

As of now, Hyatt has not issued an immediate comment or response to the court’s ruling. It remains to be seen how the company will address the violation of California labor law.

The recent ruling by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has found Hyatt in violation of California labor law for failing to promptly pay out vacation time to its laid-off employees. The court’s decision reverses the previous summary judgement in favor of Hyatt and emphasizes the importance of complying with the prompt payment provisions outlined in the California Labor Code. While the court acknowledged the challenges posed by the pandemic, it maintained that the delay in vacation time payout was a violation of the law. This ruling serves as a reminder to employers to adhere to labor laws and promptly compensate employees for their accrued benefits upon termination.

Explore more

Trend Analysis: Dynamics GP to Business Central Transition

In the rapidly evolving landscape of enterprise resource planning (ERP), businesses using Microsoft Dynamics GP face an urgent need to transition to Dynamics 365 Business Central. With mainstream support for Dynamics GP set to end in four years, company leaders must prioritize planning to migrate their systems to avoid compliance risks and increased maintenance expenses. The transition is driven by

Is Your Business Ready for Dynamics 365 Business Central?

Navigating the modern business environment requires solutions that adapt as readily to change as the organizations they support. Dynamics 365 Business Central stands out by offering a comprehensive suite of tools designed for businesses of any size and industry. By utilizing a modular approach, this robust Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) solution combines flexibility with efficiency, supporting companies as they streamline

Navigating First-Month Hurdles: Is ERP Go-Live Instantly Rewarding?

Implementing an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system such as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central often comes with high expectations of streamlined operations and enhanced efficiencies. However, the initial phase post-implementation can be fraught with unexpected challenges. Businesses anticipate an immediate transformation but swiftly realize that the reality is often more complex. While the allure of instant benefits is strong, the

B2B Marketing Trends: Tech Integration and Data-Driven Strategies

A startling fact: Digital adoption in B2B marketing has increased by 75% in the last three years. This growth raises a compelling question: How is technology reshaping how businesses market to other businesses? The Importance of Transformation The shift from traditional to digital marketing in the B2B sector is nothing short of transformative. As businesses across the globe continue to

Can Humor Transform B2B Marketing Success?

Can humor hold the key to revolutionizing B2B marketing? This question has been swimming under the radar for quite some time, as the very notion seems counterintuitive to traditional norms of professionalism. Yet, a surprising shift reveals humor’s effective role in sectors once deemed strictly serious, urging a reconsideration of its strategic potential. The Serious Business of Humor Historically, B2B