Today, we’re thrilled to sit down with Ling-Yi Tsai, a seasoned HRTech expert with decades of experience helping organizations navigate change through innovative technology. With a deep focus on HR analytics and the seamless integration of tech in recruitment, onboarding, and talent management, Ling-Yi has guided countless professionals and companies toward success. In this conversation, we dive into the critical elements of transitioning from individual contributor to executive decision-maker, exploring the power of mentorship, the art of leading high-performing teams, and the importance of cultivating a commanding presence in today’s dynamic work environments.
How has mentorship shaped your journey to becoming a leader in HRTech, and what role did it play in your career growth?
Mentorship has been absolutely pivotal in my career. Early on, I didn’t always see the bigger picture, and having someone with experience to guide me helped me avoid costly missteps. Mentors gave me perspective on navigating organizational politics and prioritizing long-term goals over short-term wins. Their advice often came from hard-won lessons, which saved me from learning the hard way. Beyond that, they provided a sounding board when I faced tough choices, helping me build confidence in my decision-making.
Can you share a specific moment when a mentor’s guidance made a significant difference in avoiding a mistake or overcoming a challenge?
Absolutely. Early in my career, I was leading a project to implement a new HR analytics tool, and I was so focused on the tech rollout that I overlooked the importance of stakeholder buy-in. My mentor pointed out that without key leaders on board, the project would flop no matter how good the tool was. They coached me on how to frame the benefits in terms of business outcomes, not just features. That shift in approach turned skeptics into advocates, and the project became a success. Without that nudge, I could’ve derailed my credibility early on.
What’s the distinction between mentorship and sponsorship in your view, and how have both impacted your path?
To me, mentorship is about personal growth and guidance—someone who invests time to help you develop skills and navigate challenges. Sponsorship, on the other hand, is about advocacy. A sponsor uses their influence to open doors for you, often speaking up on your behalf in rooms you’re not in. Both have been crucial for me. Mentors helped me build my expertise in HRTech, while sponsors amplified my visibility by recommending me for high-stakes projects or roles. Without that dual support, I wouldn’t have moved into leadership as quickly.
Can you recall a time when a sponsor’s advocacy created an opportunity you wouldn’t have had otherwise?
Yes, there was a defining moment a few years back when my company was restructuring its leadership team. I wasn’t even on the radar for a senior role, but a sponsor—a senior executive I’d worked with on a digital transformation project—put my name forward. They highlighted my ability to bridge tech and business needs, something they’d seen firsthand. That endorsement landed me a seat at the table for discussions I wouldn’t have accessed otherwise. It was a turning point that fast-tracked my career.
How did you build trust with someone who later became a sponsor for you?
It started with delivering results consistently. I made sure that every project I worked on with senior leaders showcased not just technical skills but also my ability to think strategically. Beyond that, I sought informal opportunities to connect—like grabbing a quick coffee or asking for feedback on a complex issue. Over time, those interactions built a relationship based on mutual respect. When they saw I was reliable and forward-thinking, they naturally became an advocate for me.
Shifting gears, how did you adapt when moving from an individual contributor role to leading a team, especially in the HRTech space?
The transition was a steep learning curve. As an individual contributor, I was used to owning my work and measuring success by my output. Leading a team meant letting go of that control and focusing on enabling others. I had to learn how to delegate effectively while still ensuring outcomes aligned with organizational goals. In HRTech, where projects often involve cross-functional collaboration, I also had to become a translator of sorts—helping my team understand both tech and business priorities. It was about shifting my mindset from ‘me’ to ‘we.’
What was one of the toughest challenges you faced when you first started managing a team, and how did you tackle it?
One of the biggest hurdles was dealing with underperformance on my team. Early on, I had a team member who wasn’t meeting expectations, and I struggled with how to address it without demotivating them or the rest of the group. I realized I had to approach it with empathy but also clarity. I sat down with them, focused on specific behaviors rather than personal traits, and worked together on a plan to improve. I also sought advice from a mentor on balancing accountability with support. Over time, that team member turned things around, and it taught me the value of direct, constructive feedback.
What strategies have proven most effective for you in building a high-performing team?
I’ve found that fostering a sense of ownership is key. I set clear expectations and align team goals with the broader mission, so everyone understands how their work matters. I also prioritize regular check-ins—not to micromanage, but to remove roadblocks and offer support. Another big piece is recognizing achievements, both big and small, to keep morale high. In HRTech, where projects can be complex and long-term, celebrating progress helps sustain momentum. Ultimately, it’s about creating an environment where people feel trusted and valued.
How do you define and cultivate executive presence, especially in tech-driven fields like HRTech?
Executive presence, to me, is about projecting confidence, clarity, and credibility, even when you don’t have all the answers. In HRTech, where you’re often navigating ambiguity—whether it’s a new tool rollout or shifting business needs—it’s about showing stakeholders that you can steer the ship. I’ve worked on this by focusing on communication: being concise, listening actively, and anticipating concerns before they’re raised. It’s also about staying composed under pressure, which I’ve honed through experience and by seeking feedback on how I come across in high-stakes situations.
How do you ensure visibility for yourself and your team’s work, especially in remote or hybrid settings?
Visibility in a remote or hybrid world takes intentional effort. I make it a point to communicate progress regularly through updates in shared platforms or during cross-departmental meetings. I also encourage my team to showcase their wins, whether through presentations or informal shout-outs. Building relationships virtually is just as important—scheduling quick check-ins with senior leaders or peers helps keep our work top of mind. It’s about being proactive rather than waiting for someone to notice what we’re doing.
Looking ahead, what is your forecast for the role of technology in shaping executive leadership and team dynamics in the coming years?
I believe technology will continue to redefine how leaders operate and how teams collaborate. Tools like AI-driven analytics will become even more central to decision-making, allowing executives to predict trends and allocate resources with precision. At the same time, tech will push leaders to prioritize human connection—building trust and engagement in distributed teams will be critical as remote work persists. I see a future where successful executives are those who can balance leveraging cutting-edge tools with fostering a people-first culture. It’s an exciting time, but it’ll demand adaptability and a willingness to keep learning.