Are Leaders Ignoring Critical Feedback During Times of Change?

Article Highlights
Off On

Do you consider yourself a good listener? If so, you’re not alone. According to Accenture research, 96% of people believe they listen well. However, 98% admit they face significant distractions, and two-thirds say that listening has become more challenging in today’s digital-heavy workplace. As we navigate constant flux, the challenge of truly listening, responding, and engaging with others becomes even more pronounced. According to Gallup, globally, only one in four employees strongly agree their opinions count at work.

In times of change, the ability to listen—both in agreement and disagreement—becomes crucial for leaders. Change often brings uncertainty and anxiety, making it essential to listen actively and empathetically. Ignoring feedback can lead to disengagement and a breakdown of trust within the team. Here are strategies leaders can employ to ensure they are effectively listening and responding to feedback during times of change.

Pay Attention, Even If You Disagree

Disagreement can be uncomfortable, but it’s a natural part of leadership, especially during transitions. When faced with opposing opinions, it’s crucial to listen actively and respond thoughtfully. Before any significant change, team members may voice several concerns about the direction or strategy. Acknowledging their perspectives, even when disagreeing, can help them feel valued.

For example, if an organization undergoes restructuring, leaders should invite team members to share their thoughts. During such discussions, saying, “I understand that this change can be challenging. Can you share your concerns with me?” fosters open dialogue and helps grasp the emotions behind their reactions. This approach not only makes individuals feel heard but better equips leaders to address concerns.

After the change is implemented, it’s essential to continue listening by inviting feedback about how the change affects team members. Asking questions like, “What challenges have you faced since the change?” or “How can we improve the new process?” ensures ongoing engagement. Such engagement reassures team members that their opinions matter, fostering a culture of trust and commitment.

Broaden Your Perspectives

As a leader, it’s easy to get stuck in a bubble, especially when focused on the big picture during times of change. Actively seeking opinions that differ from your own is crucial both before and after implementing changes. Engaging with diverse viewpoints can challenge biases and broaden understanding, fostering a culture of psychological safety.

Imagine an organization preparing to adopt new technology. While the benefits may seem clear to leadership, the team might have reservations. Before the change, consider hosting informal discussions where everyone can voice their thoughts, concerns, and suggestions, empowering the team to feel part of the decision-making process. This inclusive approach can mitigate resistance and enhance buy-in.

One healthcare leader discovered that high turnover was partly due to employees feeling unheard during tech transitions. By implementing regular “rounding” sessions post-change, team members had a platform to express their thoughts on the new technology. This ongoing and real-time dialogue cultivated a culture of openness and trust, ultimately improving retention rates. Such practices ensure that diverse perspectives remain central to organizational processes.

Clarify The Reasoning

People are more likely to support decisions when they understand the reasoning behind them. While this seems basic, leaders often overlook this expectation, perhaps due to fear of resistance or time constraints in dynamically reacting to ongoing changes. However, clear communication of the “why” is essential both before and after changes are made.

When implementing a new process that some team members resist, sharing the rationale behind it can make a difference. For instance, explaining, “We’re making this change to improve efficiency and enhance our service to clients. I’d love to hear your thoughts on this,” builds trust and encourages engagement. This transparency provides context, helping team members understand the bigger picture.

After implementing changes, reinforcing the reasons behind the change and asking for feedback on goal alignment is just as important. Questions like, “Now that we’ve implemented this new process, do you feel it’s helping us achieve our goals? Where are we missing the mark? What can we do better?” foster ongoing dialogue and promote a sense of ownership. Such practices build commitment among team members, ensuring that everyone pulls in the same direction.

Invite Varied Input But Decide With Certainty

During times of change, it’s essential to invite input from various voices both before and after decisions are made. This inclusive approach minimizes blind spots and sparks innovation. Once all viewpoints have been considered, decisiveness becomes crucial—diversity in counsel, unity in command.

Research finds agreeable leaders are often perceived as more effective, demonstrating empathy and cultivating stronger relationships. However, overemphasis on agreeableness can lead to challenges in environments that prioritize harmony and consensus. Leaders expressing disagreement might be seen as poor listeners or dismissive. Thus, fostering a collaborative atmosphere while creating space for honest dialogue, even involving differing opinions, is essential.

The real challenge lies in striking a balance—supporting your team while providing constructive feedback and making difficult decisions. Leaders must cultivate an atmosphere where diverse perspectives are welcomed and respected. Effective leadership involves finding the sweet spot where empathy meets decisiveness. When planning a significant strategic shift, gathering insights from various departments and synthesizing them into a clear direction is vital.

Once the change is implemented, continuous seeking of input and feedback remains important. Encouraging the team to share thoughts on the new direction by asking, “How do you feel about how we’ve implemented this change? What adjustments could enhance our approach?” ensures that feedback loops remain open and productive.

Prioritize Emotional Connection

Listening during times of change is more than collecting information; it’s about building emotional connections. Change can evoke uncertainty and anxiety, and when leaders understand their team members’ feelings and perspectives, they create a sense of trust and belonging.

Imagine a team facing a tight deadline due to unexpected priority shifts. Actively listening to concerns and acknowledging stress can make a significant difference. Leaders should listen not just to respond but to understand. Comments like, “I know this change has added pressure, and I want to ensure we address your concerns. How can I support you during this transition?” encourage team members to voice ideas and collaborate effectively.

Listening And Leading At The Speed Of Change

During times of change, it’s critical to seek input from a variety of voices both before and after decisions are determined. This inclusive strategy reduces blind spots and sparks innovation. Once all perspectives are evaluated, decisiveness is key—valuing diverse counsel but maintaining unity in leadership.

Research shows that agreeable leaders are often seen as more effective because they demonstrate empathy and build stronger relationships. However, emphasizing agreeableness too much can create issues in environments that prioritize harmony and consensus. If leaders always agree, they might appear as poor listeners or dismissive of alternative ideas. Therefore, fostering a collaborative environment that allows for honest dialogue, even when opinions differ, is essential.

The real challenge lies in balancing—supporting your team while providing constructive feedback and making tough decisions. Leaders should cultivate an atmosphere where diverse perspectives are welcomed and respected. True leadership finds the sweet spot where empathy meets decisiveness. When planning a major strategic change, gathering insights from various departments and combining them into a cohesive strategy is crucial.

Once the change is in place, continuing to seek input and feedback is important. Encouraging the team to express their thoughts on the new direction by asking, “How do you feel about how we’ve implemented this change? What adjustments could enhance our approach?” ensures that feedback channels remain open and effective. This keeps the team engaged and the strategy dynamic.

Explore more

Your CRM Knows More Than Your Buyer Personas

The immense organizational effort poured into developing a new messaging framework often unfolds in a vacuum, completely disconnected from the verbatim customer insights already being collected across multiple internal departments. A marketing team can dedicate an entire quarter to surveys, audits, and strategic workshops, culminating in a set of polished buyer personas. Simultaneously, the customer success team’s internal communication channels

Embedded Finance Transforms SME Banking in Europe

The financial management of a small European business, once a fragmented process of logging into separate banking portals and filling out cumbersome loan applications, is undergoing a quiet but powerful revolution from within the very software used to run daily operations. This integration of financial services directly into non-financial business platforms is no longer a futuristic concept but a widespread

How Does Embedded Finance Reshape Client Wealth?

The financial health of an entrepreneur is often misunderstood, measured not by the promising numbers on a balance sheet but by the agonizingly long days between issuing an invoice and seeing the cash actually arrive in the bank. For countless small- and medium-sized enterprise (SME) owners, this gap represents the most immediate and significant threat to both their business stability

Tech Solves the Achilles Heel of B2B Attribution

A single B2B transaction often begins its life as a winding, intricate journey encompassing hundreds of digital interactions before culminating in a deal, yet for decades, marketing teams have awarded the entire victory to the final click of a mouse. This oversimplification has created a distorted reality where the true drivers of revenue remain invisible, hidden behind a metric that

Is the Modern Frontend Role a Trojan Horse?

The modern frontend developer job posting has quietly become a Trojan horse, smuggling in a full-stack engineer’s responsibilities under a familiar title and a less-than-commensurate salary. What used to be a clearly defined role centered on user interface and client-side logic has expanded at an astonishing pace, absorbing duties that once belonged squarely to backend and DevOps teams. This is