Aerospace Companies Settle with Workers Over Alleged Illegal No-Poach Agreement

A group of aerospace companies has reached a settlement with workers who claimed that the companies were engaged in an illegal no-poach agreement. In a significant development, Cyient Inc. has agreed to pay $7.4 million to resolve the allegations. This settlement comes after a lawsuit by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) in 2021, which accused a former executive at Raytheon subsidiary Pratt & Whitney of participating in a long-running conspiracy to restrict the hiring and recruiting of engineers and skilled workers.

Background Information

The Wednesday settlement relates to a class-action complaint filed by workers against several companies and executives involved in the alleged no-poach agreement. The workers’ original complaint highlighted that the DOJ’s ongoing criminal investigation and prosecutions would not adequately compensate those harmed by the companies’ anticompetitive conduct. Without the class action, the affected workers would have been unable to obtain compensation for the harm they suffered, while the defendants would retain the benefits of their unlawful conspiracy.

Settlement details

The standout feature of the settlement is Cyient Inc.’s agreement to pay $7.4 million to the affected workers. Alongside Cyient, QuEST Global Services-North America, Inc., Parametric Solutions, Inc., and Agilis Engineering, Inc. have also reached settlement agreements, although the specific terms of those settlements were not disclosed.

Motion for Preliminary Approval

According to court documents, the plaintiffs intend to file a motion seeking preliminary approval of the settlements. This marks an important step in the process as it indicates the parties’ commitment to resolving the dispute and providing compensation to the affected workers.

Previous developments

In a similar case last April, a federal judge acquitted six executives named in the DOJ’s suit, ruling that the alleged agreement did not constitute an allocation of the relevant employment market in violation of federal antitrust laws. This decision served as a reminder that successfully proving the anti-competitive nature of a no-poach agreement can be a complex legal challenge.

Government crackdown on no-poach agreements

In recent years, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and other federal regulators have signaled their intent to crack down on no-poach agreements. While the results have been mixed, these efforts demonstrate a commitment to upholding fair competition and protecting the rights of workers.

Abandoned Criminal Indictment

Notably, in November, the DOJ abandoned its first-ever criminal indictment related to a no-poach agreement. This decision indicates the inherent challenges faced in prosecuting such cases and reinforces the need for civil litigation, like the class-action complaint in this settlement, to provide redress for affected employees.

Recent successful case

However, the agency has also achieved success in combating no-poach agreements. In 2022, the DOJ obtained a guilty verdict in a case involving a contractor providing nursing services to a Nevada school district. The contractor was ordered to pay $134,000 in penalties by a district court judge, illustrating that enforcement efforts can yield tangible results.

The settlement between the aerospace companies and the affected workers marks a significant step towards seeking compensation for individuals harmed by the alleged no-poach agreement. While the federal government’s crackdown on these agreements has faced challenges, civil litigation, such as class-action complaints, plays a crucial role in ensuring justice and providing recourse for employees. As the landscape surrounding no-poach agreements evolves, ongoing efforts by regulators will continue to shape labor markets, competition, and workers’ rights.

Explore more

How Can We Boost Engagement in a Burnout-Prone Workforce?

Walk into a typical office in 2025, and the atmosphere often feels heavy with unspoken exhaustion—employees dragging through the day with forced smiles, their energy sapped by endless demands, reflecting a deeper crisis gripping workforces worldwide. Burnout has become a silent epidemic, draining passion and purpose from millions. Yet, amid this struggle, a critical question emerges: how can engagement be

Leading HR with AI: Balancing Tech and Ethics in Hiring

In a bustling hotel chain, an HR manager sifts through hundreds of applications for a front-desk role, relying on an AI tool to narrow down the pool in mere minutes—a task that once took days. Yet, hidden in the algorithm’s efficiency lies a troubling possibility: what if the system silently favors candidates based on biased data, sidelining diverse talent crucial

Will AI Replace Human HR in Tech Recruitment?

In a bustling tech hub, a hiring manager at a leading software firm watches as an AI system screens 10,000 applications in mere hours, shortlisting candidates for a critical cybersecurity role, transforming a process that once took weeks into one that unfolds before lunch. Yet, as the algorithm delivers its top picks, a nagging doubt lingers—can a machine truly grasp

How Are Data Engineering and AI Transforming Private Equity?

What happens when an industry built on gut instinct and boardroom strategy collides with the raw power of data and artificial intelligence? Private equity, long a domain of high-stakes financial maneuvering, is undergoing a radical shift as technology rewrites the rules of the game. Picture a deal room where algorithms uncover hidden risks in seconds, or a portfolio dashboard predicting

Boost Small Business Growth with Buy Now, Pay Later Tools

In the bustling world of retail, small businesses are constantly searching for innovative ways to stand out and attract customers, and one powerful solution is making waves in 2025. Picture a young shopper eyeing a coveted gadget in a local store, hesitating at the price tag—until they spot a sign offering payment in easy, interest-free installments. This is the power