Project Rosalind: Unleashing the Potential of CBDCs and APIs in Retail Payments

As governments and central banks continue to explore and plan the implementation of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), the importance of exploring their functionality and security is becoming increasingly crucial. Project Rosalind, directed by the BIS Innovation Hub London Centre, is an initiative designed to test how Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) can facilitate retail payments in CBDCs. The ultimate aim of Project Rosalind was to explore public-private sector collaboration models that could facilitate retail payments in Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). This would involve designing and developing APIs that could support innovation and enable private sector programmability, making CBDCs more user-friendly and practical.

Public-Private Sector Collaboration

One of the key focuses of Project Rosalind was public-private sector collaboration. Beyond the practical aspect of developing the API infrastructure for CBDC retail payments, the project aimed to demonstrate the importance of partnerships between the public and private sectors in the development of CBDCs.

Participants in the Ecosystem

The project involved collaborations between various participants in the ecosystem. Besides the central bank and the technology vendor for the project, Quant, other stakeholders including payment service providers, merchants, and fintech companies were also involved. This allowed the project to demonstrate the various use cases for CBDCs that could add value to people’s lives.

Quant’s Contribution

As a pioneer in blockchain for finance, Quant played a significant role in the success of Project Rosalind by contributing to the design and development of API functionalities aimed at supporting innovation and enabling private sector programmability. The work done by Quant has demonstrated how APIs can help ensure the easy adoption and widespread use of CBDCs.

Gilbert Verdian and Martin Hargreaves

Gilbert Verdian, founder and CEO of Quant, stated that “For the first time, money is ready for the digital age. A CBDC will enable citizens and businesses to automate cumbersome payments and processes, and finally implement logic into money.” This viewpoint is critical to the success of CBDCs, demonstrating the potential for the technology to make payments faster, more secure, and efficient. Apart from Gilbert Verdian, Martin Hargreaves – a product manager at Quant – was also an integral member of the project. Hargreaves played an instrumental role in the development of the API infrastructure that facilitated retail payments in CBDCs. Working closely with other stakeholders in the ecosystem, they created an innovative public-private sector collaboration approach, ensuring the practical application of CBDCs is emphasized.

Examples of CBDC Use Cases

Project Rosalind demonstrated various use cases for CBDCs that could add value to people’s lives. One of the most significant benefits of CBDCs was seen in the fight against fraud, as they have the potential to offer a more secure payment option. Additionally, the coexistence of CBDCs with the traditional money system opens up several exciting possibilities. These include transparency in transactions, facilitating cross-border payments, and ensuring faster and more efficient processing.

As cash transactions continue to decrease globally, the implementation of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) is becoming increasingly important. Project Rosalind demonstrated that innovation in the API space can enable more practical and user-friendly CBDCs. Furthermore, the project highlighted the significance of the public-private sector collaborations in the development of CBDCs. With the groundwork lay by Rosalind, the potential impact of CBDCs on the world of payments is becoming increasingly significant.

Explore more

AI Human Resources Integration – Review

The rapid transition of the human resources department from a back-office administrative hub to a high-tech nerve center has fundamentally altered how organizations perceive their most valuable asset: their people. While the promise of efficiency has always been the primary driver of digital adoption, the current landscape reveals a complex interplay between sophisticated algorithms and the indispensable nature of human

Is Your Organization Hiring for Experience or Adaptability?

The standard executive recruitment model has historically prioritized candidates with decades of specialized industry tenure, yet the current economic volatility suggests that a reliance on past success is no longer a reliable predictor of future performance. In 2026, the global marketplace is defined by rapid technological shifts where long-standing industry norms are frequently upended by generative AI and decentralized finance

OpenAI Challenge Hiring – Review

The traditional resume, once the golden ticket to high-stakes employment, has officially entered its obsolescence phase as automated systems and AI-generated content saturate the labor market. In response, OpenAI has introduced a performance-driven recruitment model that bypasses the “slop” of polished but hollow applications. This shift represents a fundamental pivot toward verified capability, where a candidate’s worth is measured not

How Do Your Leadership Signals Affect Team Performance?

The modern corporate landscape operates within a state of constant flux where economic shifts and rapid technological integration create an environment of perpetual high-stakes decision-making. In this atmosphere, the emotional and behavioral cues projected by executives do not merely stay within the confines of the boardroom but ripple through every level of an organization, dictating the collective psychological state of

Restoring Human Choice to Counter Modern Management Crises

Ling-yi Tsai, an organizational strategy expert with decades of experience in HR technology and behavioral science, has dedicated her career to helping global firms navigate the friction between technological efficiency and human potential. In an era where data-driven decision-making is often mistaken for leadership, she argues that we have industrialized the “how” of work while losing sight of the “why.”