Potential Collapse of BTC Market: Spot Bitcoin ETF Approval and Market Predictions

The long-awaited approval of a spot Bitcoin ETF has been a topic of anticipation and speculation in the crypto market. However, renowned gold bug Peter Schiff has raised concerns about the potential consequences of such an approval. Meanwhile, Matrixport, a data-centric consultancy firm, has predicted a delay in the approval process. This article examines the warnings and predictions surrounding the approval of a spot Bitcoin ETF and its potential impact on the BTC market.

Peter Schiff’s Warning and the Role of a Spot Bitcoin ETF

For years, the promise of a U.S.-listed spot Bitcoin ETF has provided price support and speculative demand for Bitcoin. Schiff, known for his skepticism towards cryptocurrencies, has warned that the approval of a spot Bitcoin ETF could have adverse effects. While this approval has been perceived as positive for the Bitcoin price, Schiff believes it may lead to a collapse if institutional demand fails to materialize.

Potential Collapse of BTC Price if Institutional Demand Fails to Materialize

The approval of a spot Bitcoin ETF could potentially attract institutional investors who have been waiting for a regulated investment vehicle to enter the market. However, if the anticipated institutional demand falls short, it could result in a significant decline in Bitcoin’s price. The market’s dependence on institutional investment underscores the importance of sustainable demand for the successful integration of a spot Bitcoin ETF into the market.

Matrixport Predicts Delay in the Approval of Spot Bitcoin ETF

Matrixport, a respected consultancy firm, has analyzed the situation and predicts a delay in the approval process. According to their experts, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is likely to reject all spot BTC ETF applications before the Jan. 10 deadline. This prediction challenges previous reports from unnamed sources that had suggested approval was imminent.

Delayed Approval Expectations by Matrixport

Matrixport’s analysis suggests that the approval for the first spot Bitcoin ETF is unlikely to occur before Q2 2024. Their prediction is based on the current composition of the SEC’s voting commissioner leadership, where Democrats hold a dominant position. This political factor may reduce the likelihood of approval, as it is uncertain whether any of the commissioners, including SEC Chair Gary Gensler, would vote in favor of a spot Bitcoin ETF.

Contradictory Reports and Missed Approval Expectations: Amidst the optimism surrounding the approval of a spot Bitcoin ETF, reports from unnamed sources projecting approval by January 2 did not materialize. As the January 10 deadline approaches, there has been a notable shift in market sentiment from optimism to skepticism. This skepticism is evident through the weakness observed in crypto mining stocks and the sell-off of crypto-related U.S. stocks. These market reactions reflect growing doubts about the likelihood of the approval of a spot Bitcoin ETF.

Balchunas’ Revised Perspective on Approval Chances

Renowned Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas, who has been closely following the spot Bitcoin ETF debate, initially believed there was a 99% chance of approval in the first quarter of 2024. However, Balchunas now considers the possibility of the SEC delivering the “rug pull of a decade” by rejecting the applications once again. This revision in perspective highlights the unpredictability and uncertainty surrounding the final decision.

The approval of a spot Bitcoin ETF has been a long-awaited milestone for the crypto market. However, warnings from Peter Schiff and predictions made by Matrixport suggest potential challenges in the approval process. The influence of the SEC’s leadership composition and the contradictory reports have created uncertainty and skepticism among market participants. The Bitcoin market waits with bated breath as the January 10th deadline approaches, eager to witness the SEC’s decision and its potential impact on the market as a whole.

Explore more