How Forbes Ranks The Best Wealth Teams in Every State

Article Highlights
Off On

Navigating the landscape of wealth management to find a truly exceptional advisory team is an increasingly complex endeavor, with profound implications for families seeking to preserve and grow their legacies. The annual ranking of America’s top wealth management teams represents far more than a simple list; it is the culmination of a deeply investigative and research-driven methodology developed by SHOOK Research. This rigorous process is designed to move beyond easily quantifiable metrics to identify elite advisory teams that embody the highest standards of service and integrity. At the core of this evaluation is the recognition that the role of a wealth advisor has fundamentally evolved from that of a mere investment strategist into a central, indispensable partner in the multifaceted financial lives of the clients they serve. This shift necessitates a sophisticated, quality-first approach to pinpoint the teams that not only deliver outstanding results but also act as genuine fiduciaries and role models within the financial industry.

The New Standard for Wealth Management

Beyond Investment The Holistic Team Approach

The nation’s premier wealth management teams have expanded their services to operate as a central command center for their clients’ entire financial universe, offering a comprehensive suite of solutions that extend well beyond traditional portfolio management. These integrated teams coordinate a wide array of specialists to address every facet of a family’s wealth, including sophisticated strategies for multi-generational wealth transfer and intricate estate planning. Furthermore, they provide expert guidance on liability and debt management, helping clients navigate complex borrowing and credit decisions, while also developing tailored strategies for philanthropy and charitable giving that align with family values. Many leading teams now offer highly bespoke services, such as concierge support, high-end customized financial reporting for complex holdings, and coordination for family governance and meetings. This holistic model ensures that all components of a client’s financial life are working in concert, providing a seamless and deeply integrated partnership built for long-term success. The modern paradigm of wealth management is fundamentally centered on the collaborative power of a multi-disciplinary team, a structure that far surpasses the capabilities of a single advisor. These elite teams are intentionally constructed with specialists from diverse fields, ensuring that clients have access to expert advice across all their financial needs without having to coordinate multiple disparate relationships themselves. This can include in-house or closely partnered experts in tax planning, insurance, trust services, and specialized lending. A key function of the team is to facilitate family governance, helping to establish a clear framework for decision-making and communication across generations. They also play a crucial role in family education, preparing younger family members for the responsibilities of stewardship and providing guidance on career planning. This deeply embedded, team-based approach fosters a level of trust and continuity that is essential for managing significant wealth over the long term, cementing the team’s role as a vital part of the family’s core advisory circle.

The Power of Local Expertise

The decision to structure the ranking on a “Best-In-State” basis is a deliberate strategy designed to uncover exceptional advisory talent across the entire nation, not just within its largest financial hubs. National rankings often have an inherent bias toward major metropolitan areas like New York and San Francisco, inadvertently overlooking high-performing teams in states with smaller, though no less significant, concentrations of wealth. This state-specific model democratizes the recognition of excellence, ensuring that outstanding teams in markets such as Alabama and Iowa receive the visibility they deserve. The underlying philosophy is that investors are frequently better served by advisors who possess an intimate understanding of the local economic landscape, its unique industries, and its cultural nuances. This approach provides a valuable resource for individuals and families seeking top-tier advisory services within their own communities, empowering them to find a partner who is both accessible and deeply attuned to their specific regional context.

The value of local expertise extends far beyond mere geographical convenience; it provides a distinct competitive advantage in tailoring financial strategies to the specific circumstances of a client. For example, a team based in Houston is likely to possess a deep and nuanced understanding of the energy sector, offering invaluable insights to executives in the oil and gas industry. Similarly, an advisor in Silicon Valley can provide specialized guidance on startup funding and equity compensation, while a team in the agricultural heartland may have unique expertise in commodities and futures markets. This specialized knowledge allows for a more precise and effective advisory relationship. Moreover, a local presence helps to cultivate the deep, personal, and family-like connections that many clients seek. This proximity fosters a foundation of trust and mutual understanding that is difficult to replicate from afar, solidifying the advisor’s role as a long-term, accessible, and deeply committed partner in the client’s financial journey.

The SHOOK Research Methodology A Deeper Dive

A Quality-First Philosophy

The SHOOK Research methodology deliberately distances itself from what it terms “robo-rankers” by anchoring its evaluation in a profound commitment to qualitative analysis. While quantitative data such as assets under management and revenue generation are considered, they serve as a starting point rather than the ultimate determinant of a team’s standing. The core of the process is an exhaustive, due-diligence-based investigation aimed at identifying teams that serve as true “role models” in the industry, exemplifying best practices and delivering a superior client experience. This philosophy is encapsulated in a single, powerful guiding question that informs every stage of the evaluation: “Would we recommend this team to a friend or family member?” This personal standard ensures that quality, integrity, and client-centricity remain the paramount considerations, elevating the ranking from a simple statistical exercise to a trusted measure of excellence and reliability in the wealth management profession.

This commitment to qualitative assessment is operationalized through a multifaceted and deeply investigative process designed to provide a complete picture of each nominated team. SHOOK stands as the only ranking organization that conducts extensive interviews—in-person at the advisors’ offices, supplemented by telephone and virtual meetings—to gain firsthand insight into their operations. This process is not limited to the team’s principals; it involves discussions with multiple team members to understand the firm’s culture, internal dynamics, service model, and investment philosophy from the top down. To achieve a true 360-degree perspective, the analysis is further enriched by gathering information from the teams’ management, their peers, and even their direct competitors. This comprehensive approach provides a well-rounded and objective view, ensuring that the teams recognized are not only successful on paper but also respected for their character, professionalism, and unwavering dedication to their clients’ best interests.

The Nuts and Bolts of the Ranking Algorithm

Before a team can be considered for the ranking, it must first satisfy a set of foundational requirements designed to establish a baseline of experience and professionalism. A key criterion is that at least one member of the team must possess a minimum of seven years of experience as an advisor, ensuring a significant track record in the industry. Additionally, the team must have been operating in its formal structure for at least one year, demonstrating stability and a cohesive working relationship. Completion of an extensive online survey is mandatory, providing the initial quantitative and qualitative data points for the evaluation. Finally, every team must have an acceptable compliance record. This review is conducted with a nuanced perspective, acknowledging that not all infractions carry the same weight. Factors such as the age and nature of an issue, whether it was a firm-level or individual failure, and written support from the advisor’s current firm are all carefully considered to provide essential context. All the data gathered from the initial survey and the in-depth interview process is fed into a sophisticated, proprietary algorithm engineered to fairly and objectively compare thousands of advisory teams. This system analyzes a wide spectrum of variables, integrating both quantitative metrics—such as revenue trends, client retention rates, and the quality of assets under management—with the crucial qualitative insights derived from the extensive interviews. The algorithm applies specific weightings to these variables, placing a higher priority on factors that reflect SHOOK’s core emphasis on industry best practices, sustainable business models, and the delivery of a superior client experience. In a critical point of distinction, investment performance is deliberately excluded as a ranking criterion. This is due to the lack of audited, universally comparable performance data from advisors and the fact that client objectives and risk tolerances vary so widely that a direct comparison of returns would be both impractical and misleading.

Upholding Integrity and Transparency

The final ranking of top wealth management teams represented a definitive resource for investors, built upon a foundation of objectivity and an unwavering commitment to a client-first ethos. In the interest of maintaining complete transparency and managing expectations, several key disclosures were clearly articulated to underscore the integrity of the process. A core principle was independence; neither SHOOK Research nor its media partners received any form of compensation from wealth management teams or their firms in exchange for placement on the ranking. This ensured that the selections were based solely on merit. It was also clarified that the list represented the carefully considered opinion of SHOOK Research, intended to serve as a valuable tool to assist investors in their due diligence process, rather than an endorsement or a guarantee of any team’s future performance. This transparent framework provided investors with confidence in the credibility of the rankings as they sought out the best possible stewardship for their financial futures.

Explore more

Is AI Creating a Hidden DevOps Crisis?

The sophisticated artificial intelligence that powers real-time recommendations and autonomous systems is placing an unprecedented strain on the very DevOps foundations built to support it, revealing a silent but escalating crisis. As organizations race to deploy increasingly complex AI and machine learning models, they are discovering that the conventional, component-focused practices that served them well in the past are fundamentally

Agentic AI in Banking – Review

The vast majority of a bank’s operational costs are hidden within complex, multi-step workflows that have long resisted traditional automation efforts, a challenge now being met by a new generation of intelligent systems. Agentic and multiagent Artificial Intelligence represent a significant advancement in the banking sector, poised to fundamentally reshape operations. This review will explore the evolution of this technology,

Cooling Job Market Requires a New Talent Strategy

The once-frenzied rhythm of the American job market has slowed to a quiet, steady hum, signaling a profound and lasting transformation that demands an entirely new approach to organizational leadership and talent management. For human resources leaders accustomed to the high-stakes war for talent, the current landscape presents a different, more subtle challenge. The cooldown is not a momentary pause

What If You Hired for Potential, Not Pedigree?

In an increasingly dynamic business landscape, the long-standing practice of using traditional credentials like university degrees and linear career histories as primary hiring benchmarks is proving to be a fundamentally flawed predictor of job success. A more powerful and predictive model is rapidly gaining momentum, one that shifts the focus from a candidate’s past pedigree to their present capabilities and

Your Worst Hire Is a Symptom of Deeper Flaws

The initial sting of a mismatched employee joining the team is often just the beginning of a prolonged and costly period of disruption, but its true value is frequently overlooked in the rush to resolve the immediate problem. Rather than being treated as an isolated incident of poor judgment or a single individual’s failure, this experience serves as one of