I’m thrilled to sit down with Dr. Maurice Herlihy, a titan in the world of computer science whose pioneering work in distributed systems has directly influenced the foundations of blockchain technology. With a remarkable academic journey from Harvard and MIT, and a career adorned with prestigious awards like the Dijkstra and Gödel Prizes, Dr. Herlihy brings unparalleled expertise to his advisory role at BlockDAG, a promising Layer 1 blockchain. Today, we’ll explore his incredible career, the intersection of his research with blockchain innovation, and how his guidance is shaping BlockDAG’s vision for scalability and security.
How did your academic journey at Harvard and MIT shape your passion for computer science and distributed systems?
My time at Harvard, where I studied mathematics, really sparked my curiosity about abstract structures and problem-solving. That laid a strong foundation for diving into computer science. At MIT, while pursuing my Ph.D., I was exposed to cutting-edge ideas in distributed systems. It was an exciting time—computing was evolving rapidly, and I became fascinated by how multiple systems could work together reliably despite failures or delays. MIT challenged me to think deeply about theoretical concepts that later became critical for real-world applications, including blockchain.
Can you explain distributed systems in simple terms and why they’re so vital for technologies like blockchain?
Distributed systems are essentially a collection of independent computers working together to achieve a common goal, without a single point of control. Think of it like a team where everyone has a role, but no one person calls all the shots—they have to coordinate. My early work at Carnegie Mellon and DEC Cambridge Research Lab focused on making these systems reliable and efficient, even when parts fail or don’t communicate perfectly. For blockchain, this is crucial because these networks are distributed by nature—thousands of nodes need to agree on transactions without a central authority. Without solid distributed system principles, blockchains couldn’t ensure trust or scale effectively.
You’ve earned prestigious honors like the Dijkstra Prize and Gödel Prize. What do these mean to you on a personal level?
Honestly, these awards are humbling. They represent recognition from my peers for decades of hard work and dedication to advancing our understanding of complex systems. On a personal level, they’re a reminder of how far the field has come and how much impact theoretical work can have on practical technology. I also think they lend credibility to projects I’m involved with, like BlockDAG, by signaling that the ideas and approaches I advocate are grounded in rigorous, proven research.
What inspired you to take on an advisory role with BlockDAG, and how does it connect to your expertise?
I was drawn to BlockDAG because of its ambition to tackle some of the hardest problems in blockchain—scalability and security—using a fresh approach. My career has been about finding robust solutions to coordination and fault tolerance in distributed systems, and BlockDAG’s vision of blending Directed Acyclic Graph structures with Proof of Work resonated with that. I saw an opportunity to apply decades of research to a real-world project that could redefine how Layer 1 blockchains operate, and I wanted to help guide that journey.
BlockDAG’s use of DAG structures with Proof of Work is quite unique. Can you walk us through what makes this approach stand out?
Traditional blockchains often process transactions in a linear chain, which can create bottlenecks as more users join the network. BlockDAG, by leveraging a Directed Acyclic Graph, allows multiple blocks to be processed in parallel, significantly boosting throughput. Combining this with Proof of Work ensures security by making it computationally expensive to attack the network. My research in consensus mechanisms helped shape how we ensure this structure remains fault-tolerant, meaning the system can handle failures or malicious actors without breaking down. It’s a powerful balance of speed and safety compared to many existing solutions.
Scalability is a persistent challenge in blockchain. How are you helping BlockDAG overcome this hurdle?
Scalability is indeed a tough nut to crack because as transaction volumes grow, so do the risks of delays or vulnerabilities. My role involves drawing on lessons from past research, like designing systems that distribute workloads efficiently across many nodes. With BlockDAG, we’re focusing on optimizing the DAG structure to handle high transaction rates without sacrificing security. It’s about ensuring the system can grow to support global use while maintaining the integrity and speed users expect. A lot of my input goes into stress-testing these ideas theoretically before they’re implemented.
Your involvement also extends to governance and consensus protocols for BlockDAG. Can you share what that entails?
Governance and consensus are about how a blockchain makes decisions and maintains fairness across its network. My work here involves designing models that ensure all participants—nodes, miners, users—can coordinate effectively, even in adversarial conditions. For BlockDAG, this means crafting rules and protocols that prevent any single party from dominating while ensuring the system remains resilient to attacks or failures. Good governance is essential for global adoption because it builds trust; without it, users and developers won’t feel confident in the platform’s long-term stability.
With BlockDAG already raising $384 million in its presale, how do you see this momentum reflecting the project’s potential?
The presale success is a strong indicator that there’s significant trust and excitement around BlockDAG’s vision. Raising $384 million shows that both retail and institutional backers believe in the project’s ability to deliver on its promises of scalability and security. From my perspective, it’s also a validation of grounding innovation in solid research. It’s encouraging to see the market respond to a project that prioritizes durability over short-term hype, and I think it sets a strong foundation as we aim for the $600 million goal.
What is your forecast for the future of blockchain technology, especially with projects like BlockDAG leading the way?
I’m optimistic about blockchain’s future, particularly as projects like BlockDAG push the boundaries of what’s possible with Layer 1 solutions. I believe we’ll see a shift toward networks that can handle massive scale without compromising on security or decentralization—areas where BlockDAG is already making strides. Over the next decade, I expect blockchain to become a backbone for many industries, from finance to supply chains, as long as we keep solving these core challenges. My hope is that with rigorous research and innovative design, platforms like BlockDAG will pave the way for truly global, trustless systems.